AO during reassessment process, declined the latest valuation declaration, on to the ground having said that declaration was not recorded while in the original testing proceedings, and you may taxed the fresh superior built-up from the invoking sec 56(2)(viib).

However, the new assessing administrator did not take on the above submitting of the assessee and you will additional forty% away from region payment gotten against income away from residential property, towards the total earnings of one’s assessee as the unexplained money you/s 69 of one’s Act on the protective foundation

(a)(ii) so you’re able to sec. 56(2)(viib), and achieving substantiated the brand new reasonable market price away from offers considering valuation statement, because on the go out away from problem of offers, there is absolutely no range in order to invoke specifications from sec 56(2)(viib) so you’re able to taxation display advanced amassed for the products from offers.

Mehul Mehta stated from the banakhat

Assessee having substantiated display price with the aid of valuation declaration, new timing from processing valuation declaration is not relevant criteria, neither they alters the problem, to determine if reasonable market price out-of offers given are substantiated to the satisfaction regarding AO, the fresh getting rejected of valuation review of crushed you to exact same is actually received subsequent to brand new go out off issue of shares and never getting registered throughout brand spanking new analysis proceedings is actually completely wrong. (AY. 2013-14)

S. 68: Cash credits – Unexplained assets – Seizure regarding Banakhat properly signed by the assessee –Introduction You/s 68 due to non-method of getting Roi and you may Family savings regarding financial – Kept you to AO has not yet produced one topic or proof to help you disprove the new genuineness of information filed by the assessee – new beauty of the fresh funds is actually ignored. [roentgen.w.s. 69 & 153A]

Comparison was finalized if there is the newest Assessee you/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of your Operate and you will certain enhancements have been made you/s 69 on defensive base and additional introduction u/s 68 because of dollars loans. In the course of lookup during the residence of just one Sohit Mehta,a signed banakhat try discovered and you will seized. It was the situation of one’s Assessee (Co-owner plus spouse of your impugned residential property) that the purchase away from sale from belongings did not appear and you can the latest belongings package as per the caught banakhat is actually in the course of time terminated. It absolutely was after that submitted that property was still regarding label of your assessee and other a few co-people together with belongings was not transmitted in the identity off the customer mentioned on the banakhat. It had been next said that the amount acquired are returned straight back from agent, as a consequence of exactly who your order try undertaken, for the events we.elizabeth. The new impugned belongings was subsequently sold with other people.

Brand new Hon’ble bench upheld the transaction approved by the CIT(A) and therefore states you to definitely as a result of the nature away from transaction only substantive introduction can be produced in the possession of of one’s consumer as well as the seller for the reasoning if payments is made because of the customer not out out of expose supplies , the total amount needs to be extra since the undisclosed income to the complete earnings of one’s customer for the substantive basis and at the brand new exact same big date in case your acknowledgment from consideration is perhaps not revealed by the owner,the amount should be additional due to the fact undisclosed earnings with the overall income of the seller on substantive base only. Then,it is undeniable proven fact that Shri Mehul Mehta when you look at the whoever hand brand new addition was made to the substantive foundation had generated relevant disclosure in the app into the settlement which has been felt because of the the latest Settlement Commission. For this reason, which floor out-of appeal of the newest revenue really stands dismissed.

In the eventuality of 2nd floor regarding Inclusion out-of Rs 4 Lacs You/s 68 of one’s Work, the latest Hon’ble Bench held one due to non-method of getting go back of income and duplicate of savings account regarding the financial institution the newest Evaluating Administrator have addressed the personal loan matter out-of Rs 4lacs because the unexplained and you will added to the complete earnings of your assessee U/s 68 of one’s act. But not,assessee provided most indications prior to CIT(A) when it comes to lender report, confirmation containing the lender complete address, documentary indications of your control out-of farming land also it are plus explained one given that lender is a keen agriculturist therefore, he was simple in order to file one get back cash. Brand new assessing administrator has not yet put any procedure otherwise indications into the list so you’re able to disprove the brand new aforementioned facts and you will indications recorded from the assessee meant for genuineness of the mortgage transactions. Thus, attractiveness of the newest funds was disregarded. (AY 2012-13)